How Iran’s five-pronged strategy foiled the recent terrorist attacks?

Pars Today – While Donald Trump has backed down from his threats against the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran has also neutralized foreign efforts to exploit recent terrorist acts by adopting a five-pronged strategy.

According to Pars Today, citing Mehr News Agency, decision-makers in the White House have come to realize that direct military confrontation with Iran is a high-risk and unpredictable move, to the extent that some American strategists have deemed it operationally impossible.

Based on this report, any large-scale attack on Iran could lead to the halt of oil and gas flow in the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea—an event whose consequences would be the collapse of the global economy and serious damage to the Zionist regime.

Al-Mayadeen writes that even if Iran's military and intelligence capabilities are disregarded, any attempt to infiltrate the country would face a widespread response from millions of domestic supporters of the Islamic Republic—a capacity that cannot be neutralized through airstrikes or ground operations.

Under such circumstances, the option of a "devastating blow" against Iran is practically unfeasible, and the most possible action for the U.S. is limited attacks with a media function, which will not affect the field balance.

The report also points to the concerns of Iran's neighboring countries, particularly oil-export-dependent Arab governments, which are aware that any war in the region would seriously endanger their economic infrastructure.

On the other hand, the Zionist regime, after experiencing the 12-day war with Iran, has concluded that its domestic front cannot withstand the consequences of a full-scale war. Accordingly, the U.S. is trying to weaken Iran's social structure by intensifying economic pressure and supporting opposition groups.

Tehran's strategies to counter foreign plots 

According to Al-Mayadeen, Iran, relying on five pillars in recent developments, managed to control the created hybrid crisis and thwart U.S. efforts:

1. Controlling the economic and social situation 

Through implementing financial support, shelving inflation-inducing measures, and controlling prices, some economic grievances were alleviated, removing one of the factors inciting unrest.

2. Distinguishing protesters from rioters 

   The establishment distinguished between the legitimate demands of the people and organized violent actions, separating the path of protests from chaos.

3. Rational and controlled security management 

Security forces refrained from using widespread violence to prevent the grounds for foreign exploitation of bloody clashes.

4. Targeted intelligence operations

Monitoring and identifying networks organizing the riots continued precisely to prevent these groups from becoming recurring patterns.

5. Strengthening internal cohesion 

Maintaining social unity prevented the formation of political and popular divisions and thwarted efforts to create long-term chaos in the country.