Who created ISIS and why? (2)

Ghali Hassan is an independent researcher and writer living in Australia. He has just authored a lengthy article on ISIS and its godfathers. Following is the second part of his article:

It is a trick to conceal Western collusion with the terrorists. In 2012, a report by the DIA found that there were hardly any so-called "moderate rebels" in Syria, but only ISIS terrorists and their affiliates fighting – with the U.S. and its accomplices – against the Syrian State. It is a fact the Zionist-controlled mainstream Media have often ignored. The report reveals: “The Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria”. The report states that “Western countries, the Persian Gulf states and Turkey”, are supporting ISIS terror to take control of eastern Syria and establishing a declared principality in order to divide Syria and isolate the Syrian Government. Moreover, a U.S. Congressional Research Service Report (CRS) on Syria published on October 9, 2015, found that: (1) the war on Syria is between Western-sponsored terrorists and an independent government, not Sunnis and Shias as propagated by the Zionist-controlled media. In fact, the war on Syria has nothing to do with religion; (2) the Syrian “rebel opposition” is dominated by ISIS terrorists and is allied with foreign enemies of Syria; (3) the “opposition coalitions appear to lack … grass roots support” in Syria; (4) there is no “moderate” opposition. The U.S. is still to create one to act as its proxy; (5) the U.S. is arming sectarian terrorists indirectly and “possibly” directly and covertly; and (6) Washington wants to contain ISIS, but not to eliminate it, in order to use it against the Syrian Government and the Iraqi Government. Hence, ISIS is not only an Anglo-Zionist tool; it is also a pretext to destabilise and divide the region. 

As a U.S-Israel proxy terror network, ISIS is a very convenient tool and it is used: (1) as an all-purpose pretext to justify the invasions of independent nations by the U.S. and its allies “without a declaration of war”, the latest U.S.-led aggression on Syria is a good example; (2) to instill fear at home and justify the expansion of intrusive surveillance and crackdown on civil liberties; and (3) to demonise Muslims and Islam, fuelled Islamophobia and justify Western racism and attacks on Muslims. In other words, by associating terrorism with Islam, it justifies the West’s notion of absolute cultural and moral superiority. It follows, there is no “clash of civilizations”. Muslims are not at war with the West. It is an Anglo-Zionist war to advance Israel’s fascist ideology to dominate the region by violence. Since the U.S.-led coalition began bombing Syria and Iraq in August 2014, ISIS terrorists have gone from strength to strength, expanding its territory and threatened the security of both Syria and Iraq. The bombardment of Syria by the so-called “anti-ISIS coalition” is without the consent of the Syrian Government and without UN Security Council approval and therefore it is in flagrant violation of international law on daily basis. 


In Iraq, ISIS terrorists are in control of Iraq’s second largest City, Mosul. The surrender of Mosul to ISIS terrorists was part of the Anglo-Zionist plan – for many years – to facilitate the division of Iraq along sectarian-ethnic lines. The U.S.-led so-called “war on ISIS” has been deliberately ineffective. Reports show ISIS attacks and crimes in Iraq increased in the months after U.S. airstrikes began. The ongoing bombing of Iraq by the Anglo-Zionist coalition is not to defeat ISIS. It is designed to complete the destruction and division of Iraq using ISIS terrorists as a pretext.

On the ground, ISIS terrorists continue the same barbaric war under the occupation by specifically targeting Iraqi professionals, doctors, lawyers, scientists, engineers, public officials and journalists. Tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians are killed every month by the U.S.-Israel proxy terrorists. According to a recent report by two UN agencies, at least at least 18,802 civilians killed and another 36,245 wounded between January 1, 2014 and October 31, 2015. Most of the civilian deaths attributed to U.S. airstrikes on Iraq and U.S. proxy terrorists. Another 3,206,736 Iraqis are internally displaced, including more than one million children. The study emphasizes that these are conservative estimates. The UN also is careful to note that the number of civilians killed by secondary effects of the violence, such as lack of access to food, water or medical care, is unknown. In many areas of Iraq schools are closed and basic infrastructure is not functioning. The UN failed to hold the U.S. and its allies responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The ongoing violence and terror remain part of the 2003 U.S.-Britain criminal invasion and subsequent occupation of the country. In addition to deliberately destroying Iraq, the U.S. and its allies, including Britain, Israel and the Persian Gulf despotic regimes created ISIS to do the U.S. dirty work. 


It is important to remember that, the illegal aggression against Iraq in 2003 reduced one of the most advanced economies in the region to a level of social development comparable to that of the poorest countries in the world. The war caused immeasurable devastation and suffering to the Iraqi people. More than 1.5 million Iraqis, mostly women and children were killed. More than half of Iraqi professionals, including lawyers, doctors, scientists and engineers were killed or forced to flee the country. Some 5-6 million Iraqis were displaced or disappeared. The war cost. The Anglo-Zionist aggression against Iraq, which began in 1990 was the most barbaric war crime in the 20th century, an international supreme crime.

At the meantime, the U.S. is coercing the Iraqi government to agree on a permanent U.S. colonial dictatorship in the country.

Indeed, an official in the Iraqi prime minister’s office revealed that: “The U.S. delay of its support to Baghdad against ISIS was not a coincidence or an unintentional lazy reaction. It was a strategic decision, (1) to teach Iraq a lesson for rejecting U.S military bases and (2) to submit Baghdad to its will and dictate its conditions”.


The U.S.-led coalition forces are committing aggression against Syria supposedly to fight ISIS. In reality, they are attacking the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) positions and destroying vital military and civilian infrastructures. They are committing the same criminal acts in Iraq despite strong opposition by the Iraqis. These attacks are acts of aggression by a U.S.-led military coalition of imperialists. These aggressive attacks designed to provide air-cover for the terrorists to advance their terror and destruction on the grounds.

In Iraq, most Iraqis are convinced that “the U.S. is not sincere in its fight against ISIS terrorists”. ISIS terrorists are not the target. Iraqis are rightly convinced that the U.S. is “in cahoots with the terrorists it claims to be fighting”.

The truth is the U.S. is “trying to provide air-cover to ISIS terrorists and prevent the Iraqi Army from making an offensive”, said Iraqi parliamentarian Hakim al-Zamili. Another Iraqi Parliamentarian, Awatif Naima rightly accused U.S. forces of “expanding their heliborne operations in Huweija, Beiji and Sharqat in the Northern parts of Salahuddin province with the goal of assisting the ISIL terrorist group.” U.S.-led warplanes and choppers continue airdrops of weapons, ammunition, food and medical supplies directly to ISIS terrorists. In other words, “fighting” ISIS is a pretext to attack ISIS enemies, Syria and Iraq. If the U.S.-led coalition were really serious about fighting ISIS, they would be working side by side not only with Iraqi Government, but also with the Syrian Government and the SAA, not attacking them and trying to disable them.

It is now clear that, the U.S. and its allies are not “fighting” terrorism; they are on the side of the terrorists. The U.S.-led coalition forces are bombing and destroying Syria's military and vital civilian assets, they are killing Syrian civilians every day. Their “ineffectiveness” to defeat ISIS terrorists is deliberate and designed to destroy Syria as a state. For instance, Russia provided full disclosure of its operation in Syria on daily basis. By contrast, the U.S.-led coalition forces “provide no data to corroborate the results of their bombing sorties, fuelling allegations that the U.S. has been deliberately avoiding their targets and returning to base with munitions intact, or dropping their bombs into sand dunes”.

The primary aim is to topple the democratically-elected Syrian Government of President Bashar al-Assad and replace it with a weak client state, the Libya’s model of a failed state. The U.S. and its allies want to see al-Assad suffers the same fate as President Muammar al-Qaddafi in Libya. In flagrant violation of international law and UN Charter, attacked and destroyed Libya - Africa’s most prosperous and stable country. They needlessly killed thousands of innocent civilians in the seven-month aggression, culminating in the brutal lynching and murder of the Libyan leader by U.S.-NATO proxy criminals. 



The Syrian Government was targeted in criminal plot sponsored by the U.S. and its minion allies that included the world’s most despotic regimes. They tried all kinds of criminal tactics, including humanitarian blockade to undermine inter-Syrian dialogue to derail any peaceful solution to the war on Syria. The US and its allies say: “We do not negotiate with terrorists”, but they demanded that the terrorists be at the negotiations table at the UN-baked political Geneva talks scheduled for 25 January 2006. The U.S. delayed the talks because Syria and Russia refused to deal with the terrorists. So, the U.S. and its despotic allies are holding the talks to ransom. The U.S. and its allies are saying: “allow our certified terrorists to sit at the table or else.” It is an Anglo-Zionist trick to sabotage any peaceful settlement.


We all know that al-Assad has not threatened any nation. In fact, al-Assad has cooperated with the U.S. in the past. He just happened to be the most popular independent president in Syria and the region. Unlike Western leaders who are selected by the Zionist Lobby and big corporations, Assad was the Syrian peoples’ choice. According to the German, Die Propagandaschau, in May 2013, NATO data collected in Syria revealed that 70 percent of the Syrian population stood behind al-Assad and supported al-Assad’s refusal to negotiate with the terrorists. The so-called “popular uprising” against al-Assad was an armed insurrection engineered in Washington and Tel Aviv.

After nearly five years of resistance against Anglo-Zionist powers and their proxy terrorists, al-Assad had no choice but to call on the Russian Federations for assistance. Unlike the illegal bombardment of Syria by U.S.-led coalition, Russia’s intervention is legal because Russia was invited by the legitimate Syrian Government to assist Syrian troops in defeating the ISIS terrorists. In an interview with Germany’s Bild-Zeitung on 05 January 2016, President Vladimir Putin acknowledged Russia’s failure in Iraq and Libya. “We have failed to assert our national interests, while we should have done that from the outset. Then the whole world could have been more balanced.” While it is too late for the millions of innocent Iraqis and Libyans murdered by the U.S. forces and U.S. proxy armies, Putin does not want another ruined and failed state in Syria. Moreover, Putin knows that ISIS terrorists pose very serious threat to Russia and responded courageously to al-Assad’s call. Russian forces in Syria are not only fighting for Syria, but they are first and foremost fighting for Russia. The U.S. and its allies have made it clear about their intention of using ISIS terrorists in Russia, and even in China to foment unrest.

In fact, ISIS terrorists and their affiliates have already declared war on Russia. After all, Russians were the victims of recent ISIS heinous terrorist bombing of the Russian airliner Airbus 321 over the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula. The terrorist act that took the lives of 224 innocent Russian civilians was cowardly described by the British Defence Secretary Phillip Hammond as a “warning shot”, not terrorism. Hammond hoped that the terrorist act would change Russia’s foreign policy in Syria. Can you imagine Hammond calling the 9/11 attacks in the U.S. a “warning shot” that would change U.S. foreign policy in the region? Of course, Russians, know that Hammond is a psychopath disseminating anti-Russia dirty propaganda. It is the kind of propaganda practiced by Western politicians and the Zionist-controlled Western media on a daily basis. Terrorism is terrorism no matter who the victims are and who the perpetrators are.

One might wonder why these same nations that pretend to “fight terrorism” have vehemently and violently opposed Russia’s serious war efforts to defeat ISIS terrorists. Indeed, Russia has been unfairly accused of targeting “moderate” terrorists. The U.S. refuses to share intelligence and coordinate with Russia and the SAA against ISIS terrorists. Of course, this is consistent with the U.S. primary aim of using ISIS terrorists against the Syrian and Iraqi governments.

RM/ME