Religious minority MPs blast UN rights resolution against Iran

Religious minority lawmakers at the Iranian parliament have condemned a UN human rights resolution against Tehran, calling it a conspiracy hatched by the US, Israel and their allies.

According to Press TV, the resolution, sponsored by Canada, was passed at the UN General Assembly on December 18, accusing Iran of discriminating against women and religious minorities. Western states, along with Saudi Arabia and the UAE, voted for it.

In a joint statement on Sunday, Assyrian, Jewish, Zoroastrian and Armenian Christian lawmakers denounced the resolution as "one-side and spiteful", saying it was in line with the US policy of pressuring Iran.

"Although the contents of the resolution appear to be about human rights, it is in essence a political statement and a pressure tool raised with specific strategic objectives against our country," they said.

The signatories were MP Yunaten Bet Kelia, who represents the Assyrian and Chaldean communities in the Iranian parliament, Georgic Abramian and Karen Khanlari who represent Armenian Christians as well as Zoroastrian MP Esfandiar Ekhtiari and Jewish MP Siamak Moreh Sedgh.

"We, the representatives of religious minorities of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, strongly condemn this resolution for its instrumental use of human rights concepts and regard it one-sided and spiteful which tries to internationally isolate our country by applying again multiple standards," they added.

The lawmakers called on Iran's Foreign Ministry to "vociferously and effectively" condemn the resolution and closely monitor the positions and movements of the "recalcitrant and reactionary regimes of the region".

"We also expect our diplomatic apparatus... to neutralize the anti-Iranian conspiracies of America, the Zionist regime and their allies in the international arena in coordination with the friendly countries," they added.

On Thursday, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi said the resolution had been devised based on a “selective, ill-intentioned, confrontational, and politically-charged attitude”.

Mousavi noted that those supporting the resolution were themselves some of the regimes known for their blatant violation of human rights and adopting double standards toward the rights issue.

SS