The Queen's Secret (4)
https://parstoday.ir/en/radio/world-i101115-the_queen's_secret_(4)
The life of Princess Diana had different ups and downs but it caused a big problem for Queen Elizabeth II.
(last modified 2021-04-13T02:52:40+00:00 )
Mar 07, 2019 04:49 UTC

The life of Princess Diana had different ups and downs but it caused a big problem for Queen Elizabeth II.

Prince Charles, as the heir apparent of the British throne, married with Princess Diana at Saint Paul Cathedral on July 29, 1981. Princess Diana was from the Spencer family which had close relations with the royal family. The marriage was held after the approval of the Queen.

After a few years of marital life and having two children, the relations of Prince Charles and Princess Diana were not as warm as before and each of the spouses had found new loves. In 1992, their relations were exposed. Later on, then premier, John Major, announced that the couple want to part in an amicable manner. Finally, they divorced in 1997. This led to the royal family's clashes with Diana, especially, given that she made friends with an Egyptian called Dodi al-Fayed. They seemed to plan for marriage. On August 30, 1997, Dodi came to Paris and, along with Diana, they left Paris for London with a black Mercedes. They had hired the car to escape the attention of photographers. Three minutes after their departure, they had a serious collision in which Dodi died instantly. Princess Diana was breathing. 2 hours after the collision, she was taken to a hospital but at 4 a.m., her doctor announced her death. Queen Elizabeth II appeared on TV and read out the condolence message. There was a huge crowd in her funeral but there were doubts among masses on the causes of the event. The British mainstream media called these doubts as "Conspiracy Illusion", but many people believed that if Dodi had taken Princess Diana with his own car, this event wouldn't have happened. Richard Tomlinson, an MI6 member, announced that Diana had been under supervision of MI6 operatives before her death. However, he rejected his remarks shortly after and said that his memory was failing him.

The next investigations revealed that the black Mercedes of Diana and Dodi had crashed into a white Fiat but the French police couldn't find any trace of the Fiat. Dodi's father, Muhammad al-Fayed, assigned some people to probe into the issue on his own expense. Then he announced that the Fiat car belonged to a photographer journalist, called James Anderson. He had sold his car a few months after the incident. The police interrogated Anderson only to conclude that he had not been guilty. But, three years later, in May 2000, the news was released that Anderson's corpse was found in a BMW car in the forests in the south of France, while the doors of the car were locked and there was no switch. According to the official reports, Anderson had committed suicide. Hence, the file was closed. The Anderson family rejected the police claim and said that he had just found a new job and had high spirits.

Another dubious point on the death of Princess Diana and Dodi was the lack of any CCTV photos. There were 10 cameras in the area but no picture was recorded. The officials claimed the cameras belonged to an office which wasn't working at that time of night. This fiction didn't convince anyone because CCTVs record their pictures automatically round the clock.

By the way, what was the reason for the British royal family's dissatisfaction with Princess Diana? Perhaps, because she was pregnant and the coming British princes and princesses would probably have step-siblings from a Muslim father. This was an unprecedented and intolerable issue for the British royal family. Britain has no official religion in practice but the Queen is the head of the Church of England. The role of the Queen and royal family has been rejected in many wars and coups; but this event attracted many attentions to the royal family in Britain. However, the British courts announced that according to researches, the collision and death of Diana and her fiancé was unintentional and there was no conspiracy. This has failed to convince the public opinion.

Elizabeth II just thinks of safeguarding her grip on power. This has raised questions among the British public opinion. In 2007, BBC broadcast a documentary, titled Monarchy: The Royal Family at Work also known as One Year with the Queen which contained a scene of dispute by the Queen. The BBC officials immediately apologized the royal family members.

The awarding of Knighthood by the Queen to the apostate author Salman Rushdie in 2007 once more revealed the enmity of the royal family and the Queen herself toward Islam and Muslims. In 2008, Daily Mail announced that the British royal family intended to open a branch of stealth Freemasonry in Buckingham Palace. Nevertheless, the Queen's spokesperson said that she had not issued the official permission for the issue.

The British statesmen and state-run media constantly claim that the monarchy is merely a ceremonial establishment and has no power in the country!!! They say that the main policymaker and decision-maker in wars and coups are the governments and parliaments. Were the government and parliament the decision-makers in killing Princess Diana, too?  

RM/ME